Literature Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Writing Review - Essay Example Kennedy (2008) anyway contends that the general interests of the transsexual youngsters are overlooked by both the schools just as the families other than division of kids is likewise focusing on them. (KENNEDY). This contention is in this way in congruity with the contentions of Dewey who guarantee that transsexual kids disguise various situations all alone and plan their techniques in a way that permit them to conform to the changing conditions other than permitting them to manage their future ailments. The combination of both of these articles in this way would recommend that however the transsexual kids are overlooked by their families, schools and even the branch of kids, in any case, they have the capacity to build up their own inner pictures of how to manage the distinctive troublesome and simpler circumstances. This improvement along these lines contributes towards the accomplishment of their important endurance inside the general public. Menvielle (2009) additionally contends on the job of families in helping their kids to figure out how to adapt to the truth of transsexuality and whether a kid is assisted with making a progress to sexual orientations from the phase of adolescence is talked about. (Menvielle). Menwielle anyway gives a depiction of how families can be educated and prepared to manage the difficult circumstance of managing their youngsters and helping them to make a progress. This contention along these lines inalienably brings up towards the way that current family framework and qualities might be lacking in offering conscious help to such kids to confront the troublesome circumstances throughout everyday life and cause effective to transitiona and experience different formative stages without any problem. What is critical in any case, about the contentions of every one of the three contentions is the way that Kenney gives proof in regards to the job of schools and families in helping their kids to all the more likely adapt to the truth. Menvielle in this manner gives additional proof with regards to how the

Outline and Evaluate the Use of One Qualitative Method in the Academic Study of Sport Essay Example

Diagram and Evaluate the Use of One Qualitative Method in the Academic Study of Sport Essay Example Diagram and Evaluate the Use of One Qualitative Method in the Academic Study of Sport Essay Diagram and Evaluate the Use of One Qualitative Method in the Academic Study of Sport Essay Diagram and assess the utilization of one subjective strategy in the scholarly investigation of game Denzin and Lincoln (2000a) accept that subjective research is guided by 3 standards: presumptions, qualities and convictions. These neutralize, nearby or inside positivist and post-positivist models. Quantitative research is the utilization of numerical estimations and investigation that includes quantifiable ‘quantities’ by Gratton and Jones (2004). Quantitative information is gathered through shut inquiries for what it's worth set up to give realities. While subjective information, then again, prevalently utilizes open styled inquiries to acquire data through follow up questions, broad answers and discussions. There are numerous contrasts between the two ideal models with the scientist being objective, and ‘detached’ from the subject under scrutiny inside quantitative information said by Gratton and Jones (2004). Additionally, subjective research is fairly the inverse, with the scientist being set up to accumulate more data from the members being referred to. Notwithstanding the past, Morse, Swanson and Kuezel (2001) accept a quantitative research requires the specialist to painstakingly characterize factors that might be evaluated with numbers. Then again, subjective research is a more comprehensive point of view as opposed to a theory affirmation. Berg and Latin (2008) accept subjective research permits an open-finished and adaptable way to deal with evaluation. Inside the subjective worldview there are a few unique information assortment techniques, for example, open polls, interviews, perception, visual and literary examination. I will plot and assessing the utilization of meetings inside the scholastic investigation of game; this will be centered primarily around center gatherings. Culver (2003) states that meetings are without a doubt the most widely recognized strategy for gathering subjective information inside the investigation of game. Pettigrew (1990) and Pettus (2001) additionally state ‘interviews offer a profundity of data that allows the point by point investigation of specific issues in a manner unrealistic with different types of information collection’. Inside this kind of research strategy there are 4 distinct sorts of meetings; organized, semi-organized, unstructured and center gathering. Organized meetings are eye to eye (analyst member), comprise of shut and pre-decided inquiries notwithstanding the structure being formal. Semi-organized meetings can be modified so that the participant(s) being referred to would ether be able to explain or expand on a specific subject/proclamation. The way to deal with information assortment is adaptable, with tests being utilized to accumulate extra data. Unstructured meetings have a set topic with the respondent driving the meeting. The inquiries are created all through, as they are not pre-decided. These inquiries are open and adaptable. A negative point to this meeting structure is that there’s a possibility the meeting will need center. Center gatherings lean towards being semi-organized with a conversation postulation being utilized inside an open domain; center gatherings comprise of more than one individual. John Amis (2005) accepts ‘focus bunches permit individuals to challenge one another, create places of agreement, and expand on each other’s ideas’. Notwithstanding this past explanation, Gratton and Jones (2004) accept this can turn into a negative point if the analyst doesn’t keep the members on subject, expressing that ‘participants might be enticed to give bogus information to establish a connection upon others in the group’. This can be possibly maintained a strategic distance from on the off chance that you utilize either an arbitrary, or separated irregular example which has a partitioned populace. Moreover these members won’t know each other. Inside center gatherings there is an enormous amount of qualities; members can expound on the specific subject(s) particularly when the analyst utilizes tests. Related to this Yin (1994) takes note of that the questioner ‘provides saw easygoing inferences’ from the actor’s, as opposed to the researcher’s perspective. As a center gathering is commonly unstructured or semi-organized it empowers members to uncover certain understanding into their perspectives and practices notwithstanding significant subjects and startling information to rise, Gratton and Jones (2010). Center gatherings are increasingly adaptable as you can likewise increase visual and vocal data; for instance non-verbal communication, giggling, quiet or cautious thought, their manner of speaking, or even basically what specific members are stating. This can prompt the specialist examining as specific members will be progressively enthusiastic about specific subjects/themes. Also you can increase a relationship with your members, which can prompt them being increasingly open and consistent with the data they give inside the gathering. Related to this, members are educated that everything talked about is kept classified, along these lines this will unwind and ease members so they’re ready to connect completely inside the conversations. Meetings require more assets in contrast with surveys. This could be as far as time utilization or voyaging, as an outcome coming about examples can be little, Gratton and Jones (2010). Specific members could assume responsibility for the meeting consequently getting predominant; scientists should then incorporate specific tests guaranteeing other gathering individuals get included to increase a progressively different assortment of information. Then again, members could discover center gathering conditions threatening or potentially off-putting; which can prompt the participant(s) being referred to feeling compelled to concur with the prevailing member. Evalued[online]) Analyzing information can likewise be troublesome notwithstanding recording the meeting. John Amis (2005) states that it is independent of the kind of meeting, that the manner in which information is recorded ought to be built up earlier and it is standard method to record the meeting on sound tape. The analyst should likewise guarantee that the information accumulated i s dependable. Gratton and Jones (2004) accept this can be spoken to with the condition; ‘reliability = number of understandings/(number of understandings + disagreements)’. Mental Qualities of Elite Adolescent Rugby Players is an examination study augmentation on Holland and colleagues’ (2010) concentrate into required mental characteristics of youthful capable rugby players, Woodcock et al (2011). Center gatherings were finished after Kruger and Casey’s (2000) prescribed size of 6 to 8 members, guaranteeing that you don’t surpass 10. One gathering broke this rule with 2 members taking an interest inside SAS (Sports Administration Staff), which could upset examined information with the possibility of understanding being likely and data being constrained. Stewart, Shamdasani, and Rook (2007) caution that less than eight members can prompt a thin conversation one-sided toward the perspectives on a couple of people. Center gatherings were held in natural and ameliorating situations notwithstanding unbiased areas for guardians, which was set up to cause members to feel more calm. The center gathering was semi-organized with the arbitrator utilizing tests to increase a more inside and out knowledge into their perspectives and convictions. Besides the arbitrator increased a relationship with the members on passage so that they’d feel good alongside this strategy helping them to take an interest inside gathering conversations. Through utilizing center gatherings Woodcock et al (2011) established 5 new subgroups inside the 11 higher request topics recognized by youthful players in Holland et al, (2010). These 5 subthemes were: off pitch correspondence, reflection on their capacities in a goal way, taking data and recreating it as a physical activity, managing wounds just as demeanor towards wounds and that players should be issue solvers, ready to adjust and beat difficulties. Guardians and mentors bolstered advancement of people, in their rugby association as well as inside different everyday issues. Besides they talked about cooperations that fortified improvement inside expert and execution situations. SAS featured inside the examination that the under-16 rugby program was planned explicitly to bit by bit challenge players and encourage improvement of certain mental characteristics Woodcock et al (2011). This center gathering helped increase further information and understanding inside the mental side of tip top pre-adult rugby players. Besides the manners by which guardians, mentors and the SAS build up these players’ mental when all is said in done everyday conditions. A vast lion's share of the examination accumulated relates Holland and partners (2010) study. Sexual orientation view of Wrestling is a contextual investigation set up to pick up inquire about on whether wrestling is a game basically for male competitors. This center gathering comprise of eight members from the two sexual orientations (defined arbitrary example), which was likewise semi-organized. Sports chiefs and directors for wrestling are given the chance to urge ladies to participate. For this to occur sports directors as well as heads need to see how ladies see the game. Pfister, (2010) and Ward, (2010) express that there is a developing number of ladies taking an interest in sports with certain ladies contending effectively in customarily manly games. Information gathered from the center gathering was considerable, with sees from every sexual orientation being unique; this in this way made the examination stand apart increasingly because of its speculation. The center gathering underlined that they saw wrestling to b

Merit Scholarship Award update - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

Merit Scholarship Award update - UGA Undergraduate Admissions Merit Scholarship Award update Over the last several months, the Admissions staff has carefully reviewed all our newly admitted First Year students to consider them for University of Georgia academic merit scholarships. (See the list and our discussion of merit and need-based aid at our website, https://admissions.uga.edu/article/scholarships-at-uga.html.) At this point in time, all merit based scholarships offered through Admissions have now been awarded, and we have contacted each of the recipients by email, mail and the myStatus page. At UGA, academic merit scholarships have become increasingly competitive.This is mainly due to the limited funding we have for these awards and the high number of extremely capable students who now gain University of Georgia admission. At this point, if you have not received notice that you have an academic merit scholarship to attend UGA, then unfortunately we were not able to offer one to you. We are still finalizing handful of specialized need/merit based scholarships based in large part on FAFSA information, but these are the only ones we have not awarded (and we hope to do this in the next week). If you have been selected for any of our Academic Merit awards, congratulations! Please be sure to read your offer letter carefully. Keep it for your records. In this letter you will see what requirements you must maintain to renew your scholarship each succeeding year and, in general, how much the scholarship is worth in relation to your overall costs. In addition, you should receive information from the Office of Student Financial Aid shortly on a preliminary award which would include the scholarship information. Go Dawgs!

The War Of The Vietnam War Essay - 1753 Words

VIETNAM WAR Gordon Gabriel History 222: Final Paper December 11, 2016 When I was choosing a topic for this paper I thought of many significant events within United States history during the time period we covered during the last few weeks, but there is one event that has always had my interest. That is the Vietnam War, more specifically not only the war overseas, but the war that was going on right here at home. For the remainder of my paper, I will be discussing about three major points relating to the Vietnam War. I will be talking about the life of an American solider fighting in Vietnam, the life of that soldier’s family, and the life of the average United States citizen. The life of an American soldier serving in Vietnam was unimaginable, on the battlefield and at home. In the early stages of the war, it was said that America would only be involved a short time. Solider suicide during the Vietnam era was at an all-time high . As I was doing research on the life of a Vietnam Solider I watched a documentary called â€Å"Vi etnam: Homecoming†. During the Vietnam War, most of America wanted the war to end and was not happy with the American solider and the government. Due to America’s disapproval, American soldiers were not greeted with welcoming arms. This event that the documentary shows gives the Vietnam veteran the welcome they never got. The documentary interviews several Vietnam vets and many of their experiences, and things they had to say were all too similar.Show MoreRelatedThe War Of Vietnam And The Vietnam War1525 Words   |  7 PagesThe war in Vietnam is The United States and other capitalist bloc countries supported South Vietnam (Republic of Vietnam) against the support by the Soviet Union and other socialist bloc countries of North Vietnam (Democratic Republic of Vietnam) and the Vietcong of war. Which occurred during the Cold War of Vietnam (main battlefield), Laos, and Cambodia. This is the biggest and longtime war in American history during the 1960s (Best 2008). It is a lso the most significant war after World War IIRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1475 Words   |  6 Pageson one such event, the Vietnam War, came from entertainment-based programs and the play Miss Saigon. Despite heavy coverage in such well-known comedic films as Forrest Gump and Good Morning Vietnam, the true events were anything but a laugh for those involved. In spite of the relative recentness of the events in Vietnam, many of today’s youths know little about the topic. The events in Vietnam raise the ever-present question on the ethics of third party involvement in a war otherwise unrelated toRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1729 Words   |  7 Pagesspread of communism all around the world. This is what lead to the gruesome war that lasted over a decade in Vietnam. A great deal of social changed happened all over the world, but particularly in America as the Vietnam War dragged on. As people became more aware of the atrocities going on in Southeast Asia, the end less domestic support turned into widespread explosive protest. During the first few years of the Vietnam conflict, Americans full heartedly supported the United States and its governmentRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1379 Words   |  6 Pagestensions over the Vietnam war caused many americans to become divided on the actions taken by the government across seas. Americans questioned whether the government could be trusted. The feeling of betrayal and government secrecy created the â€Å"Credibility Gap,† in which many americans believed that the government no longer was for the people, but for anything else that would benefit the government. The Vietnam War exacerbated the gap between the pro-war traditionalists and anti-war liberals along withRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1430 Words   |  6 Pagesended in 1989, the Vietnam war is still being fought, but on a different battlefield, one of public opinion. Some call this war an atrocity, a war the United States should never have joined. Others call it a crime, committed by the power hungry politicians of the U.S. Now that new information from both sides of the war has surfaced and the wounds of battle have had more time to heal there is yet another opinion emerging. The Vietnam War was in fact only one of many proxy wars fought under the umbrellaRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1155 Words   |  5 PagesThe Vietnam War cost many Americans their lives in the 60s and 70s. Many were drafted into the war by choice and others selectively chosen to join to help America. The contributions made had a major impact on the American side of the Vietnam War. Though many contributions were made none stand out any more than others. It is sometimes said there is always a hero in the war who helped the victory. Wars, however, do not have war heroes because a hero is making an undeniable contribution to the war andRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1592 Words   |  7 PagesThe Vietnam War was said to be one of the most significant wars in the twentieth century. This w ar took place from November 1, 1955 to April 30, 1975. It was at the time, the longest war in American history. Much of the conflict was centered in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. During that time, approximately 58,219 US troops were killed in action. The reason America got involved in the Vietnam War was to stop the spread of communism in South East Asia and beyond. â€Å"America’s involvement in Vietnam derivedRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1204 Words   |  5 Pagesus†¦ When that is the way you are, how do you conduct your life?† The Vietnam War killed over fifty eight thousand Americans and over 61% of the men killed were 21 years or younger. Most Americans are conflicted with the fact whether the Anti War Movement played a factor in prolonging the Vietnamese War. â€Å"In every story there are two sides and in between lies the truth.† Anonymous The United States become involved in Vietnam after the French withdrew when the Republican President Dwight EisenhowerRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War877 Words   |  4 PagesAnother big difference in this war was that the Vietnam War was had more disapproval and was more expressive within the American public, unlike the Korean War. The ANITWAR MOVEMENT started in the 1960s this group was never enacted until this era. There was not a group like this in Vietnam, but there were many groups that opposed the war. The main object of these revolts was the American military presence in Indochina. The ANITWAR MOVEMENT caused an influence not only socially, but also in the realmRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War1421 Words   |  6 PagesIn July and August of 1972, Jane Fonda made radio broadcasts from Hanoi that changed the way Americans thought of the Vietnam war and of her. To this day, many people view her as a traitor and criticise her actions in Vietnam; however, some people we re truly inspired by her words and what she had to say. Despite people s personal opinions, Fonda was a powerful speaker and knew how to convey her message to her audience. She tried to convince people that the American government and military were the

The Tragic Consequence of Blindness in King Lear - 770 Words

Samuel Butler, an English novelist, said, â€Å"A blind man knows he cannot see, and is glad to be led, though it be by a dog; but he that is blind in his understanding, which is the worst blindness of all, believes he sees as the best, and scorns a guide. Blindness is a major theme that recurs throughout Shakespeare’s play, King Lear. Samuel Butler’s quote can be used to describe King Lear, who suffers, not from a lack of physical sight, but from a lack of insight and understanding. Blindness is a factor in his poor judgment. It plays a major role in the bad decisions he makes. It leads to harsh treatment of those closest to him. It is the combination of these consequences of Lear’s failed sight that demonstrate how blindness is a major†¦show more content†¦In the end, the consequences of Lear’s blindness are severe leading to his madness and subsequently, his downfall. His inability to see things as they truly are cost him his kingdom, t he lives of his three daughters, the life of his most loyal follower, Kent, and his own life. As a result of poor judgment, bad decisions and poor treatment of others caused by his lack of insight and understanding, Lear’s life set out on its course of tragicShow MoreRelatedSight and Blindness in King Lear1615 Words   |  7 PagesSight and Blindness in King Lear In King Lear, the recurring images of sight and blindness associated with the characters of Lear and Gloucester illustrate the theme of self-knowledge and consciousness that exist in the play. These classic tropes are inverted in King Lear, producing a situation in which those with healthy eyes are ignorant of what is going on around them, and those without vision appear to see the clearest. While Lears blindness is one which is metaphorical, the blindness of GloucesterRead MoreEssay on The Theme of Blindness in King Lear by William Shakespeare862 Words   |  4 PagesThe Theme of Blindness in King Lear by William Shakespeare Shakespeares King Lear tells of the tragedies of two families. At the head of each family is a father who cannot see his children for what they are. Both fathers are lacking in perceptiveness, so the stories of the two families run parallel to each other. In Lears case, two of his daughters fool him into believing their lies. Lear shuts out his third daughter because she cannot her love into words the way he wants her to. GloucesterRead More King Lear - Theme of Blindness Essay846 Words   |  4 PagesKing Lear - Theme of Blindness In Shakespearean terms, blinds means a whole different thing. Blindness can normally be defined as the inability of the eye to see, but according to Shakespeare, blindness is not a physical quality, but a mental flaw some people possess. Shakespeare’s most dominant theme in his play King Lear is that of blindness. King Lear, Gloucester, and Albany are three prime examples Shakespeare incorporates this theme into. Each of these character’s blindness was the primaryRead More The Theme of Justice in King Lear Essay1435 Words   |  6 Pagesof Justice in King Lear Justice is a balance of misfortune and good fortune; right and wrong according to motives and circumstances of the individuals under judgement. To be just we must consider why they did it and balance out all the evidence and facts and decide on a punishment depending on these. Types of justice that exist in society include criminal justice, legal justice, vigilante justice, natural justice and divine justice. As King Lear is a brutal playRead MoreA Comparison Between King Lear and Oedipus1649 Words   |  4 PagesKing Lear Comparison A tragedy is not only an imitation of life in general but an imitation of an action, as Aristotle defined his ideas in the Poetics, which presents Oedipus as an ultimate tragic hero. There is a obvious link between the two characters in that blindness – both literal and metaphorical – is a strong theme in the stories. Issues of self-recognition and self-knowledge are significant for Oedipus as well as King Lear. For Aristotle, Reversal, Recognition and Suffering are keyRead MoreHow the Sub-Plot Mirrors the Main Plot in King Lear by William Shakespeare895 Words   |  4 PagesHow the Sub-Plot Mirrors the Main Plot in King Lear by William Shakespeare One can say that the sub plot does mirror the main plot to some extent. Some are in subtle ways and some are in the more obvious ways. Shakespeare has two plots in order to intensify the main theme of tragedy that runs throughout this play. The main plot is in which King Lear is the tragic hero however it is clear that just by misfortune he is deprived of something very valuable to him by error ofRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1564 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare s King Lear differs from the rest due to its definition of love. King Lear serves as an battleground between deception and compassion, between flattery and honesty. Rather than focusing on romantic love, such as in Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare in King Lear explores the boundaries of filial love, a bond between a favored child and a parent, that is abused because of parental blindness and hubris. In King Lear a family is ultimately faced with choices brought on by the father, King Lear himselfRead MoreEssay about William Shakespeares Relevance Today2257 Words   |  10 PagesBlairite Britain. Anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of history would be more than aware that much has changed in society since this time. Taking what is widely acclaimed as Shakespeare’s crowning artistic achievement, King Lear, as an example (as is the intention of the majority of this work), a strong case can perhaps be made to say that much of the intended theme and content is, by and large, irrelevant to a modern audience. The standard response toRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1550 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION: By facilitating the growth of evil within William Shakespeare’s King Lear, it is evident that the tragedy’s protagonist, King Lear can be held accountable for his own victimization and ultimate downfall. The most notable aspects of this self-induced victimization include Lear’s own lack of practical wisdom and divergence from the natural order, combined with the neglect of kingship, that enables Lear as a tragic hero to create the conceptual framework in which the ulterior motives of othersRead MoreOedipus As A Tragic Hero1445 Words   |  6 Pagesorder to avoid meeting his fate. Unbeknownst to the tragic hero, before the curtain’s rise, the prophecy has already been fulfilled. Consequently, due to the underlying corruption in Thebes, the people are perishing of a plague that will not cease until the man responsible for the death of the previous Theban King, King Laius, is identified and brought to justice. This urgency propels Oedipus to discover that hi s biological father is not the King of Corinth who raised him, rather Laius himself. This

Oedipus the King A Theme Analysis Free Essays

string(59) " to despise prophecy and feel almost superior to the gods\." Oedipus the King is one of the group of three plays by Sophocles known as the Theban plays since they all relate to the destinies of the Theban family of the Oedipus and his children.   The other two plays of this group are Antigone and Oedipus at Colonus. Oedipus the King relates the story of Oedipus who reached Thebes, having killed on the way an old man with whom he picked a quarrel. We will write a custom essay sample on Oedipus the King: A Theme Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now The city of Thebes was then suffering terribly because of the monster, the Sphinx. He solved her riddle and citizens of Thebes offered him the kingdom as city is afflicted with the loss of their king, who had been murdered while on a pilgrimage. So he assumed the power and married the widowed queen. Here the tragedy of Oedipus takes its final course. As city was afflicted with famine, so Delphic oracles were consulted who disclosed that troubles of the city arose from the fact that it is harboring an unclean person, the murderer of late king Laius. Oedipus resolved to get to the bottom of this mystery and punish the wrongdoer. However, he ultimately discovered that the culprit he was seeking was none other than he himself. He blinded himself and went on exile. There are various standpoints for looking at the theme of the play. It may be considered as a play enacting the theme of insecurity and illusoriness of human happiness. Or the theme may be that of the inadequacy of human intelligence in resolving the riddles of destiny. The identification of themes in Oedipus differs from reader to reader and from critic to critic. I think that Sophocles wanted to convey that a man is plunged from prosperity and power to ruin ands ignominy due to his own human failings.   It was something[1] in his character that brought his tragedy. Anything foreign to his own character only augmented the tragic proceedings but it was only his own disposition that made him a prey to disgrace. Dodds is of the view, â€Å"If Oedipus is the innocent victim of a doom which he cannot avoid, does this not reduce him to a mere flaw puppet?† Whereas Knox (1984) is of the view that Oedipus’ tragedy takes place due to tragic flaw[s] and fate as no part to play in Oedious Rex. Distinguished Professor Butcher has identified four possible ranges of human failings in Oedipus. The foremost of these connotations is an error due to unavoidable ignorance of circumstances whereas an error caused by unawareness of conditions that might have been identified and for that reason to some extent morally blameworthy The third range is â€Å"A fault or error where the act is conscious and intentional, but not deliberate. Such acts are committed in anger or passion.† (313) Where as fourth one is â€Å"A fault of character distinct, on the one hand, from an isolated error, and, on the other, from the vice which has its seat in the depraved will†¦a flaw of character that is not tainted with a vicious purpose.† (315) The crucial point is that whether Sophocles wants us to think that Oedipus has basically unsound character. One way of deciding this question is to examine what other characters in the play say about Oedipus. The only result that we can arrive at in this way is that Sophocles intends us to consider Oedipus an essentially noble person. In the opening scene of the play, the priest of Zeus refers to him as the greatest and noblest of men and the divinely inspired savior who saved Thebes from being destroyed by the Sphinx. The Chorus also considers him to be noble and virtuous. They refuse to believe in Tireseas accusations of him. When catastrophe befalls Oedipus, not a single character in the play justifies it as a doom which has deservedly overtaken Oedipus. (Dodds, p.39) So there were certain other tragic flaws that were acting behind the curtain to bring about Oedipus tragedy. Let us examine those. Oedipus seems to be obsessed with his own intelligence and this leads him to very unfortunate and uncomfortable situations. This human weakness[2] of Oedipus laps over with his pride as he is extremely proud of the fact that he was able to solve the riddle of the Sphinx which had proved too much for any other person. He thinks that Gods has capacitated him with intelligence and wisdom to solve riddle that the Thebes is afflicted with. Oedipus even taunts Tireseas on his inability in solving the Sphinx’s riddle. He says; And where were you, when the Dog-faced Witch was here? Have you any word of deliverance then for our people? There was a riddle too deep for common wits; A seer should have answered it, but answer there came none From you†¦..  Ã‚   (12-16) After calling the soothsayer false prophet, Oedipus boasts of his own skill in having solved the puzzled which proved too much for the blind seer; Until I came—I, ignorant Oedipus, came— And stopped the riddler’s mouth, guessing he truth By mother-wit, not bird-lore.  Ã‚   (17-19) So he describes Tireseas predictive cautions as the whims of a fanatic and opposes the seer’s prophecy with arguments of his own. Self-confidence and pride in his own wisdom is an outstanding feature of his character that also brings his tragedy. Here Oedipus also fulfills the traits of Aristotelian tragic hero as he possesses a noble tragic flaw. The man who sets out on his new task by sending first for the venerable seer is not lacking in pious reverence; but we also observe that Oedipus manifests unrestrained arrogance in his own intellectual achievement. No seer found the solution, this is Oedipus boast; no bird, no god revealed it to him, he â€Å"the utterly ignorant† had to come on his own and hit the mark by his own wit. This is a justified pride but it amounts too much. This pride and self-confidence induce Oedipus to despise prophecy and feel almost superior to the gods. You read "Oedipus the King: A Theme Analysis" in category "Essay examples" He tell the peo ple who pray for deliverance from pathos and miseries they are afflicted with if they listen to and follow his advice in order to get a remedy. Lastly his unrelenting pursuit of the truth is demonstrated when he believes he is the murderer and that Polybus was not his father, yet he continues with his search with the statement, â€Å"I must pursue this trail to the end,†(p.55).   These characteristics were only fuel to the fire and added to the pride created a blaze that consumed him. Bernard Knox eulogizes Oedipus’ â€Å"dedication to truth, whatever the cost† (p.117) Another characteristics of his character that contributes toward his tragedy is Oedipus’ longing for thoroughness. His inquisitive nature is not content with anything which is either half-hearted or incomplete. Nor can he brook any delay. He damns that the direction of the oracle should be given effect at once. As before, Oedipus speaks on the basis of the workings of his own mental faculties that has been tested time and again and have proved their intelligence. It can be said that the tragedy of Oedipus is the result more of his good qualities than his bad ones. It is his love for Thebes which makes him send Creon to Delphi to consult the Oracles. It is the same care for his subjects who make him proclaim a ban and a curse on the murderer of Laius. It is his absolute honesty which makes him include even himself within the curse and the punishment. He replies by saying â€Å"Sick as you are, not one is sick as I, each of you suffers in himself†¦but my spirit Groans for the city, for myself, for you†.  (62-62) He is angry with Tireseas because he is unable to tolerate the fact that   although the prophet says that he know who the murderer of Laius is , he refuses top give the information to the king. His rage and rashness is due to the fact that the masses are suffering and Tireseas does not provide the murderer’s name. Oedipus cannot but regard this as a clear manifestation of the seer’s disloyalty to his city. To Oedipus the discovery of truth is more important than his own good and safety. Even when it seems that the investigation that he is carrying on will not produce any result which will be him, he decides to carry on with it. He is so honest with himself that he inflicts the punishment of self-blinding and banishment from the city of Thebes. So his moral goodness also seems as a human failing that brings his ruin. There is another important human failing that contribute toward his tragedy i.e. his intellectual myopia. He has a limited vision and is unable to assess the situations in a right perspective. Robert L. Kane (1975) puts this preposition in this way; â€Å"He[Oedipus] was the victim of an optical illusion†. (p. 196) The juxtaposition between â€Å"outward magnificence and inward blindness of Oedipus and the outward blindness and inward sight of the prophet† (Kirkwood, p. 130) depicts two types of blindness i.e. physical and intellectual. One is related to physical sight whereas the other, the most pernicious type of blindness, pertains to insight. Tiresias is physically blind but whereas Oedipus is blind intellectually. This intellectual blindness of Oedipus also contributes greatly to lead him to his tragic destination. Oedipus possesses faultless physical vision throughout play except in the end but he remains blind to the reality regarding himself. At one point in the play, he has the ability to see but he is not willing to do so. He intellectual vision comes with his physical loss of sight but he is unable to cast away the psychological â€Å"slings and arrows† and mental sufferings that intellectual blindness has afflicted on him. So his blindness, both intellectual at the start of the play and physical at the end of the day, is the worst. Blindness interweaves with the main plot from the very start of the play when Oedipus says, â€Å"I would be blind to misery not to pity my people kneeling at my feet. (14)† It manifest that he refers to blindness that if h will not recognize the distress of his people. This shows his physical sight but intellectual blindness as he himself was the cause of those afflictions.   Later he acknowledges that although Tiresias is physically blind but has prophetic power when he says, â€Å"Blind as you are, you can feel all the more what sickness haunts our city. (344)†. Tiresias response refers to the gravity of Oedipus’ inability to see his future. He says, â€Å"How terrible – to see the truth when the truth is only pain to him who sees! (359)† Later on Oedipus denounces his own acknowledgement of Tiresias as a seer and abuses him by saying, â€Å"You’ve lost your power, stone-blind, stone-deaf – senses, eyes blind as stone!(423)† and â€Å"Blind, lost in the night, endless night that nursed you! You can’t hurt me or anyone else who sees the light – you can never touch me. (425)†. It is illustrated that it is Oedipus who is blind intellectually as he is not willing to comprehend the situation and to understand the truth. In retort to his slur, Tiresias refers to worst form of blindness that Oedipus is suffering. He says, â€Å"You with your precious eyes, you’re blind to the corruption of your life, to the house you live in, those who live with – who are your parents? (470)† and foretell, â€Å"Blind who now has eyes, beggar who now is rich, he will grope his way toward a foreign soil, a stick tapping before him step by step. (517)†. These supportive texts clearly manifest that Oedipus was afflicted with severe intellectual myopia as he was unable t see the truth that was pervasive all around him. Actually he was unwilling to see truth around him, prior to his physical blindness and afterwards as he blinds himself not to observe the things around him. His is the most insidious form of blindness. Oedipus can be held guilty due to another human flaw—his inability to take appropriate preventive measures. It is said that he fails to take logical steps and precaution s which would have saved him from committing the crimes.   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Could not Oedipus†¦have escaped his doom if he had been more careful? Knowing that he was in danger of committing parricide and incest, would not really a prudent man have avoided quarrelling, even in self-defense and also love-relations with women older than himself?†¦ real life I suppose he might. But we not entitled to blame Oedipus either for carelessness failing to compile a hand list or lack of self-control in failing to obey its injunctions.†Ã‚  Ã‚   (Dodds, p.40) Oedipus has necessary human failings of anger and rashness. He rashly jumps into conclusions. Choragos points this out in scene II after a long speech by Creon who tries o remove the ill-fed and hastily formed suspicions of Oedipus about Creon. They say, â€Å"Judgments too quickly formed are dangerous† (II, 101) But Oedipus justifies this, arguing that ruler have to take quick decision. He says later on, â€Å"But is he not quick in his duplicity? / And shall I not be quick to parry him?† (II, 102-103) Later at the conclusion of scene II, Creon indicates the same fault in his character by saying, â€Å"Ugly in yielding, as you were ugly in rage! / Nature like yours chiefly torments themselves.† (II, 151-152) It is this rashness that makes to not merely suspect Creon but accuse him and even declares that he deserves the sentence of death. The rashness can be observed in his treatment of Tireseas. Oedipus does not lack analytical thinking but his rashness does permit him to weigh up the situation rightly and he makes hasty decision. In retrospect we see that rashness of Oedipus has something to do with the murder Laius at the hands of Oedipus. The self-blinding also is an act of rashness although Oedipus tries to give several arguments in favor of it. His bad temperament is demonstrated in the squabble between Teiresias and himself, where Teiresias utter the prophetic truth and Oedipus retorts, â€Å"Do you think you can say such things with impunity?† and afterward attributes him as a â€Å"Shameless and brainless, sightless, senseless sot!†(p.36). His character is further marked with suspicion about Creon to whom he considers as a conspirator. Kirkwood is of the view that â€Å"The Creon he [Oedipus] is battling is a figment of his imagination† (Kirkwood, 1958. p. 132) and nothing else. He says with reference his tà ªte-à  -tà ªte with Tiresaeas, â€Å"Creon! Was this trick his, then, if not yours?† So here his imagination works together with anger and rashness. All the above-mentioned manifestations of tragic flaw, their supported arguments and views of the critics clearly proves the thesis that Oedipus unavoidable ignorance was the major factor of his tragedy because he was unable to locate that the man whom he assaulted on the crossroads to Thebes was his father. Secondly, if he would not have been occupied by his aspirations, he would have possibly explored the horror of his deed and could have avoided the additional tricky situations by not marrying his mother. Thirdly, his â€Å"conscious and intentional† act includes his decision to â€Å"bring what is dark to light† (133). Furthermore, as result to revelation of Tireseas, he charges Creon with conspiracy and murder and denounces Tireases as an accessory. Although these actions were intentional and bring Oedipus to tragic end but have a clear background that illustrate that these actions were not â€Å"deliberate†. Fourthly, all these errors originate from a hasty and obstinate temperament, unjustified anger and excessive pride that compel him to an energized inquisitiveness. With the development of the plot, all these ascriptions of his character jumps back with amplified force on his head that finally culminates at his tragedy. Knox (1957) sums up in this way; â€Å"the actions of Oedipus that produce the catastrophe stem from all sides of his character; no one particular action is more essential than any other; they are all essential and they involve not any one trait of character which might be designated a hamartia but the character of Oedipus as a whole† (31). Here I want to point out that all these human failings were not innate or inborn but he developed these as his habitual formations. It was inculcated in his spirit so that it became a part of his natural disposition. If it were innate then he could not be blamed for his downfall. It was human failings rather than the destiny that brought his tragedy. So Sophocles has successfully put across that a man is plunged from prosperity and power to ruin ands ignominy due to his own human failings. References Bloom, Harold. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex. : New York : Chelsea House Publishers. 1988. Butcher, S.H. Aritotle’s theory of Poetry and Fine Arts. Hell and Wang: New York. 1961. Dodds, E. R. On Misunderstanding the Oedipus. Greece Rome. Vo. 13. No. 1. (Apr. 1966). Pp. 37-49. Cook, Albert Spaulding. Oedipus Rex, a mirror for Greek drama. Prospect Heights, Ill. : Waveland Press.1982. Gould, Thomas. Greek tragedy. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press. 1977. Gould, Thomas. Oedipus the King: A Translation with Commentary. Englewood Cliffs. 1970. Kane, Robert L. Prophecy and Perception in the Oedipus Rex. Transaction of the American Philological Association. Vol. 105 (1975). pp. 189-208. Kirkwood, G.M. A study of Sophoclean drama. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press. 1958. Knox, Bernard. Oedipus at Thebes. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957. Knox, Bernard. Introduction to The Three Theban Plays. New York London: Penguin Books,1984. O’ Brien, John M. Twentieth century interpretations of Oedipus Rex; a collection of critical essays. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall. 1968 [1] Moral flaw, habitual formations, behavioral defect etc. [2] in any other context, pride in one’s intelligence cannot not a human weakness but course of the play depicts clearly that in Oedipus the King it was a human weakness. How to cite Oedipus the King: A Theme Analysis, Essay examples

Farming in the bahamas Essay Example

Farming in the bahamas Paper There are two (2) main types of farming they are: Subsistence Farming the practice of self-sufficiency, In the way of the farmer, farming on a small scale, so that It Is enough for their own personal usage. The process of subsistence farming takes place when a piece of land Is cleared using the slash and burn method which Is to cut all greenery on the land down, dry It for a few days or so ,then burn it to ashes. SE the hoe to mix the solo with the ashes, you then supply water to the land and then start planting. Attend to the crops from time to time to maintain Its readiness. When the crop Is ready to be harvest, you pick It and tame It to Its specific needs. In order to do this you will need the following farming tools: A Hoe, A Cutlass, A Bucket or Buckets, A shovel. (II)Commercial Farming- The Practice of farming on a large scale of crops, fruits (banana vegetables (carrots, lettuce) and livestock (taming cows, pigs, chicken etc. ) and selling to make a profit. The process is carried out first by clearing a large piece of land with either a tractor r a bulldozer then the slash and burn method is used when the process of slash and burn is finished the land is cultivated into rows. The farmersFarmer attends to the crops to ensure that they are all healthy and supplies the crops with fertilizers. When the crops are ready to be harvested they are picked and carried usually by tractors or wheel barrows to a particular place normally in sheds or farm houses to be washed, cleaned, and waxed. They are then packed into boxes to be sent to packing houses. We will write a custom essay sample on Farming in the bahamas specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Farming in the bahamas specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Farming in the bahamas specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer